Despite the clowns running the circus, I still feel war can be averted. If not, a land war expansion in the east would be devastating economcally--disrupting energy flows and spiriling in unpredicable directions for the EU. Ironically, a "war economy" can be bullish for certain obvious sectors; markets in prior wars--proxy or direct--have often risen rather than fallen during peak conflict. Given the already inflated/narrow nature of US markets, a war in Europe--however unthinkable--would/could make US markets a safer haven--but it will depend on the US role in such a war. Debt levels would spike, the USD would be debased yet simultaneously favored on the DXY and gold would continue its secular rise.
Yes. Agree (and have taken action in the past)
BUT whom to trust?
https://substack.com/@vongreyerz/note/c-97549092?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=44pnf5
Will come through on another channel.
can use: jb@vongreyerz.gold
Please refer to Substack.
Despite the clowns running the circus, I still feel war can be averted. If not, a land war expansion in the east would be devastating economcally--disrupting energy flows and spiriling in unpredicable directions for the EU. Ironically, a "war economy" can be bullish for certain obvious sectors; markets in prior wars--proxy or direct--have often risen rather than fallen during peak conflict. Given the already inflated/narrow nature of US markets, a war in Europe--however unthinkable--would/could make US markets a safer haven--but it will depend on the US role in such a war. Debt levels would spike, the USD would be debased yet simultaneously favored on the DXY and gold would continue its secular rise.